City Buys Back
Railroad Right-of-Way
By CATHERINE STORTZ RIPLEY/C-T News Editor
Tuesday, January 29, 2008
CAPTION:
The Chillicothe-Brunswick Shortline Railroad, starting at this point and looking east, hasn't been used in many years and was approved two weeks ago by the federal Surface Transportation Board as being eligible for railbanking. The city sold 29 miles of the railroad right-of-way for nearly $1 million to Montoff Transportation in 2006 and on Monday city council members voted 3-2 to purchase the land back from Montoff for $10. They also gave the mayor authority to sign all documents to rail bank the right-of-way. With the railbank designation, no permanent structures may be erected on the right-of-way, but the land could possibly be developed into a trail project open to the public sometime in the future. Montoff Transportation is in the process of salvaging the rails and ties along the stretch of railroad which extends to a point near Brunswick.
C-T Photo / Catherine Stortz Ripley
The city of Chillicothe will spend $10 to buy back the 29 miles of railroad right-of-way which it sold in 2006 for nearly $1 million.
Council members voted 3-2 Monday night to purchase the right-of-way which runs from just south of Chillicothe to a point near Brunswick. They also authorized the mayor to sign documents railbanking the right-of-way so that, in the future, it could be turned into a rails-to-trails project for public recreational use.
Supporters of the effort said benefits of owning the property include having control of the land and the authority to decide on its future
use. Others expressed concerns over liability issues and costs associated with developing and maintaining the property as well as an immediate expense to make the right-of-way safe.
After discussions, council members Darrel Rinehart Jr., Earle Teegarden Jr., and Pam Jarding approved the purchase, outweighing “no” votes by council members Lonnie Sewell and Donna
Preszler.
Montoff Transportation, which purchased the portion of railroad right-of-way for $976,000, is in the process of removing the rails and rail ties, according to City Administrator Dean Brookshier. As part of the 2006 agreement with the city, Montoff applied to the federal Surface Transportation Board to have the land railbanked, which essentially allows for the land to be used for a purpose other than a railroad. The federal board approved that application two weeks ago.
In workshop discussions, City Attorney Robert Cowherd said liability would not be an issue for several reasons, including application of the Missouri recreational land act which states that if land is owned by a public entity and opened for public use the property owner usually is not liable. He also stated that if the city developed a trail on the land it could be considered part of the city's park system and would, therefore, be covered by the city's insurance policy.
Tom Ashbrook, president of the city-appointed Railroad Advisory Board, spoke to council members during their workshop meeting prior to the regular council meeting and said that it was the board's recommendation for the city to purchase the right-of-way.
“This is a good opportunity for us,” he said. “Now is the time to do
it." He also stated that the city could recoup between $12,000 and $15,000 on fees paid by any utility which crosses the right of way.
Representatives
from the Missouri Department of Natural Resources, which manages
the Katy Trail State Park, visited with city officials earlier and
had said that it cost between $20,000 and $25,000 per mile to
develop the Katy Trail and about $5,000 per mile for annual
maintenance. Cowherd said that grants could be available for
developing the right-of-way into a public trail and that one of
the larger property owners along the railroad's right-of-way would
support the project and could help develop the trail. "This
is a once-in-a-lifetime deal," Cowherd said. "If we
don't exercise it (purchasing the right-of-way), the property will
be abandoned.
The right-of-way
is a path 100 feet wide and 29 miles long. Cowherd also added that
if the city wanted to develop a recreational path it could do
small portions at a time. According to the 2006 purchase agreement
with the city, Montoff Transportation could remove the bridges on
the right-of-way at no cost. Ashbrook, however, said that DNR
recommended that the bridges be left because of the expense.
Although the bridge decks are in poor condition for rail traffic,
they could handle lighter traffic, Cowherd said. |